INDO-CHINESE BORDER INCEDENTS

RECENTLY THERE HAS BEEN INCIDENTS LIKE THESE A LOT IN THE NEWS.BUT DO THEY MEAN A LOT TO THOSE PEOPLE INVOLVED IN THESE INCIDENTS THAT IS TO THE BORDER GUARDS BOTH SIDES,I DON'T KNOW. BUT SIDES CLAIM TO THE TIBET IS HISTORY WHILE INDIAN CLAIM TO TIBET IS RELIGIOUS AND CHINESE CLAIM IS IMPERIAL.
TO EXPLAIN IN DETAIL - HAVE YOU HEARD OF MOUNT KAILASH AND LAKE MANASAROVAR IN TIBET,IF YOU DIDN'T THEN GO AND LOOK FOR IT IN  THE INDIAN HISTORY.INDIAN WERE GOING TO THE MOUNT KAILASH FOR THE PAST 3000 YEARS AS PILGRIMS.THEY DIDN'T START GOING THERE FROM 1950'S.
BUT AS FAR AS CHINESE CLAIMS GO IT STATED FORM THERE CONQUEST IN 15TH CENTURY.
SO MY POINT IS INDIAN CLAIM IS OLDER TO CHINESE.
BUT AS FAR AS MODERN INDIAN GOVERNMENT CLAIMS GO THEY DECIDED TO RESTRICT THERE CLAIMS TO BRITISH COLONIAL BORDER OF MCMOHAN LINE.WHICH CHINESE REFUSED TO ACCEPT.SAYING TIBET WAS NEVER A INDEPENDENT STATE AND THUS DOES NOT HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO ENTER INTO  AGREEMENTS.
BUT AS FAR AS HISTORY GOES TIBET WAS INDEPENDENT FROM 1911 TO 1949 WHERE IT ENTERED INTO FOREIGN AGREEMENTS ON ITS OWN TERMS.EVEN IT TIBET WAS INDEPENDENT FOR ONE DAY THEN THEY HAVE EVERY RIGHT STAKE CLAIM TO A INDEPENDENT STATE AS THE IDEA OF A INDEPENDENT STATE IS ESTABLISHED IN THE MINDS OF TIBETANS.
SO WHERE DO THE MATTERS GO NOW. I THINK THE ISSUE WILL NOT BE SOLVED IN THE NEAR FUTURE. BECAUSE BOTH INDIA AND CHINA ARE NUCLEAR POWER NORLL ACCEPT OTHER CLAIMS NOR GIVE UP THEIRS.

SO WHAT DO YOU THINK.

SINO JAPANESE TRAWLER ISSUE

CURRENTLY THE ISSUE IS RESOLVED WITH THE RELEASE OF THE CAPTIAN OF THE VESSEL.BUT I BELEIVE THE ISSUE IS FAR FROM OVER.I BELIVE THE ISSUE TO CONTINUE AS LONG AS CHINESE STAKE CLAIM TO THE ISLANDS.
ISSUE IS CHINESE CLAIM IS BASED ON THE FACT THEY RULED THE ISLANDS BEFORE THE JAPANESE CONQUEST  IN 1895 AND SUBQUENTLY BY THE DEFEAT OF JAPANESE IN SECOND WORLD WAR THE ISLANDS MUST BE RETURNED TO THEM.
BUT THE JAPANESE CLAIM IS THE ISLANDS WERE NEVER PART OF CHINA AND WILL NOT BE RETURNED BECAUSE THEY ANNEXED IT BEFORE THE 1895 TREATY.
SO MY OBSERVERATION IS BOTH ARE CORRECT IN THEIR POINT OF VEIWS.SO MY QUESTION TO THE CHINESE IS HOW DID THE ISLANDS BECAME PART OF CHINA - THE ANSWER IS - "BY CONQUEST IN 16th CENTURY".
SO WHEN THE CHINESE CAN CONQUER AND CLAIM IT TO THEM
JAPANESE CAN DO THE SAME.EVEN IF ACCEPT THE JAPANESE POSITION THAT THEY WERE NEVER PART OF CHINA IT WAS PART OF JAPAN FROM 1895 AND WOULD OF REMAINED WITH THEM IF NOT BY THE DEFEAT OF WORLD WAR.
THE NEW VICTOR USA CHOOSE TO GIVE IT TO THE JAPANESE IN THE 1970'S SO THAT ENDS THE CHINESE CLAIMS ON THE ISLAND.

SO NOW THE WHAT WILL HAPPEN NEXT. I BELIVE THAT THE ISLANDS WILL REMAIN WITH THE JAPANESE AS LONG AS THEY CHOOSE TO CLAIM IT AND DEFEND IT.AND CHOOSE NOT TOO EITHER THROUGH DILPMATIC OR MILITRY MEANS (THOUGH UNLIKLY FROM CHINESE SIDE) THE CHINESE TAKE IT BACK.

SO WHAT YOUR PEOPLE THINK OF THIS ANALYSIS. ANY COMMENTS