Friday, December 17, 2010

Fake wiki leaks in pak

Well another day in pak.These type of things happen all the time in pak who want to somehow equalise itself with india.The published fake wikilieaks are type of things that is expected from pak who some how thinks every time some thing is happens there there has to be india involved.If there is no such proof they simply make it up and publish lies and get the people enraged and tell that this enraged behavier is result of india,kashmir,religion,etc. what u guys think.

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

land scam

The recent land scam in Maharashtra is not something new these type of things happen all the time in India.the other corruption scandal involving army men selling army goods in the open market in Kashmir which was given to them at a concessional rate.both the cases explains us that where ever they are either man in uniform or civilian or in political dress they will be corrupt when the political master ask for money the bureaucratic person under him will ask for money,and so on and so forth right down to the bottom of the ladder. every one is after money.so when the former army chiefs return land this is for publicity only and not for sincere reasons.if they were sincere they would not have bought it in lot.the persons of their status and I.Q (come-on they served as Chiefs-of-staff) cannot claim they don't know the lands background.Even a common man will check for background as land originally belongs to whom and ask if there is any problem with the land?.
As i said before if the media did not take the issue then these honest men will not have returned land as quickly as they did.
These type of corruption will continue as long as there are not no independent checking of the accounts.
So what u guys say.

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

INDO-VIETNAM PARTNERSHIP

There has been news recently that Indian government has increased its relationship with  Vietnam.indo Vietnam relationship goes back from independence period,when India opposed to US intervention there.Indian government also allowed soviet aid to reach Vietnam through territory as a anti colonial initiative.after unification of Vietnam relationship fell to decline.but following India's look east policy and Mekong-Brahmaputra trade project relationship began to take new turn economically.but with the rise of china and Chinese-Vietnamese claims to oil rich islands in south china sea both the government began to come closer not only economically and also military as well. Indian naval warships began to visit Vietnam regularly and Vietnamese have been invited to Indian defence events.
so my point is we have take the relationship to next level as full extent as a new treaty of friendship both in economic but also in defence as well, like we had with soviet union in 1970.this treaty will make sure that in any indo-Chinese conflict we can count on Vietnam and vice-versa.
what you guys think.

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

IRAN ISSUE

Recently their has been news that Indian company O.V.L which has gas exploration and extraction agreement with Iran has been having 2nd thoughts.
Due to increase in U.S and E.U sanctions foreign companies are having difficulties in dealing with Iran.O.V.L has asked for legal and diplomatic opinions with other government departments over the issue.
So my point is O.V.L has to walk-out of Iran gas deal because i don't believe Indian government is going to ask American government to give a waiver only to Indian company.Given the nature of American and Iranian government relationship the American government will do any thing to make Iran craw under its knees.Iranian nuclear issue is only a picking point the American government has taken.The real issue is Iran has large reserves of oil and gas and the government in not on a friendly terms with America.
The reason American government has not attacked Iran over nuclear issue is - 1st Iran has not "yet" processed uranium for weapons and 2nd straits of Hormuz which can be blocked by Iranian even for small time which might cause disruption not halting of all tanker flow and 3rd alternate pipeline through saudi Arabia to Jordan to Israeli port of Haifa is not ready and other form Kurdistan through Syria and Lebanon Beirut is also is not ready.
So my belief is the American government will attack Iran when these pipelines are ready and when they are completely sure of Iranian nuclear program mature enough to produce nuclear weapons which they not yet have.
so what you guys think.

Sunday, October 17, 2010

PAKISTANI STATUS

IN FOLLOW-UP OF YESTERDAY'S THOUGHT,TODAY TELL THINK ABOUT STATUS OF PAKISTAN.MANY ANALYST HAVE BEEN PREDICTING FALL OF PAKISTAN FOR MANY TIME NOW.
BUT MY PERCEPTION OF PAKISTAN AS A FAILED STATE AND FAST LY DISINTEGRATING INTO MULTIPLE MINI STATES WITH NUKES DOES NOT SEE ANY RATIONAL OUTCOME.
MY PRECEPTION OF PAKISTAN AS A UNIFIED STATE WILL CONTINUE TO EXIT AS LONG AS WE ALLOW IT EXIT, IT IS NOT GOING TO FALL ANY TIME SOON.SIMPLE REASON BEING THE LIFE OF PAKISTAN DEPENDS ON ITS ETERNAL HATRED OF INDIA."HATE INDIA" IS THE ONLY WORD THAT IS HOLDING PAKISTAN TOGETHER.SO AS LONG AS INDIA EXITS PAKISTAN IS GOING TO EXIT IN ITS PRESENT FORM.
JUST AS AN "EXTERNAL HELP" WAS NEEDED ON BANGLADESHI FREEDOM FROM PAKISTAN ANY BALUCH OR SIND OR PATAN FREEDOM CAN ONLY TAKE PLACE WITH AN EXTERNAL HELP.
AS LONG AS INDIAN GOVERNMENT IS NOT GOING TO AID THESE PEOPLE AND HELP THEM GAIN THEIR INDEPENDENCE FROM PUNJABI DOMINATION THERE WILL ALWAYS GOING TO A UNIFIED PAKISTAN AND A UNIFIED PAKISTAN WILL ALWAYS GOING TO BE ETERNAL DANGER TO EXISTENCE OF INDIA.
SO WHAT YOU GUYS THINK

Saturday, October 16, 2010

KASHMIR ISSUE

THERE ARE A LOT AND I MEAN A LOT OF ARTICLE'S AND THEORY'S ABOUT WHAT WENT WRONG IN KASHMIR.BUT AS FOR AS AM CONCERNED THAT MAJOR ISSUE IS INDIAN GOVERNMENT UNWILLINGNESS TO ACT DECISIVELY ON THE SO CALLED  FREEMDOM FIGHTERS.WHAT I MEAN TO SAY IS LETS LOOK ALL THE OTHER SO CALLED FREEDOM FIGHTING PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD HOW MANY PEOPLE ROME AROUND THE COUNTRY OPENLY AND PREACH FREEDOM AND GET AWAY WITH IT IN THERE RESPECTIVE COUNTRY.SAY FOR EXAMPLE BASQUE PEOPLE LIVING IN SPAIN AND FRANCE, ALL THE FREEDOM FIGHTERS ARE UNDERGROUND AND HIDE THEIR FACES WHEN THEY APPEAR IN PUBLIC AND THE HIDING THEIR FACES IN PUBLIC IS COMMON IN ALL THE OTHER FREEDOM FIGHTER IN IRELAND,PHILIPPINES,EASTERN TURKESTAN IN CHINA,CHECHNYA IN RUSSIA ETC.IN ALL THESE COUNTRIES THE SO CALLED FREEDOM FIGHTERS ARE AFRAID TO APPEAR IN PUBLIC BECAUSE IF THEY DO SO THEY WILL BE KILLED ON THE SPOT.NOW IF THE SAME POLICY IS FOLLOWED IN INDIA HOW MANY PEOPLE IN KASHMIR WILL ROME AROUND TALKING OF FREEDOM AND GET AWAY WITH IT.
SO MY POINT IS WE HAVE DO THE SAME.AND GET RID OF THEM FASTER THEN THEY CAN GET REPLACED BY THE OUTSIDE COUNTRY AND MAKE SURE THEY DO NOT GET ANY OUTSIDE HELP AS RUTHLESSLY AS  EVERY OTHER COUNTRY DEALS WITH THEIR FREEDOM FIGHTERS.
SO WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK.

Thursday, October 14, 2010

PAKISTAN-AFGANISTAN BORDER ATTACK

CURRENTLY THERE HAS BEEN SERIOUS OF ATTACKS ON CONVOYS ON PAK-AFGHAN BORDERS BOTH ON KHYBER PASS IN PAK'S NWFP AND BO LAN PASS IN BALUCHISTAN.THESE ATTACKS MARKS SIGNIFICANT EVENT IN MEDIA.BUT ALL THOSE PEOPLE WHO WATCH THE REGION WILL INFORM THAT THESE ATTACKS ON COMMERCIAL VEHICLES IN NOT NEW.TALIBAN OR ROBBERS ASK FOR MONEY FROM THE VEHICLES THAT PASS IN THEIR REGION THEY CONTROL.WHEN THE VEHICLES REFUSE TO PAY THEY ATTACK AND LOOT THE VEHICLES.THIS IS TYPICAL HIGHWAY EXTORTION AND ROBBERY TAKING PLACE BUT THE PAK GOVERNMENT DOES NOT DO ANYTHING TO STOP IT.BECAUSE AS WE ALL KNOW USUALLY THE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND ARMY PERSONAL WHOM ARE POSTED IN THE AREA CO-OPT WITH THE TALIBAN OR LOOTERS AND THEY GET THEIR SHARE.
SO MY POINT IS THIS SUDDEN MEDIA ATTENTION IS NOT WITHSTANDING AND IT WILL SOON FADE AWAY FROM THE MEDIA.IF UNTIL THE REAL PROBLEM THE PAK GOVT., IS NOT TAKEN DOWN WITH EXTERNAL MILITARY INTERVENTION THE ISSUE WILL GO ON.
SO WHAT YOU GUYS THINK LET ME KNOW.

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

SINO-PAKISTAN BORDER LANDS

THERE HAS BEEN NEWS RECENTLY THAT PAKISTAN HAS HANDED ITS BORDER LANDS IN GILGET-BALTITAN TO CHINA FOR A CERTAIN AMOUNT.HOWEVER PAKISTAN HAS DENIED IT.EVEN IT IS TRUE THAN IT MEANS NOTHING.AS PAKISTAN HAS CONTROLLED THE REGION FOR 60 YEARS AND INDIAN GOVERNMENT WAS UNABLE TO RECOVER IT.THERE IS NO POINT IN PROTESTING OVER IT NOW.
EVEN IF THE CHINESE ARE THERE FOR ROAD BUILDING AS TOLD BY PAKISTAN GOVERNMENT THEY ARE THERE WITH THE KNOWLEDGE AND APPROVAL OF THE PAKISTAN GOVERNMENT WHO CONTROL THE REGION.
IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY ABOUT A DECADE BACK IN BENAZIR BUTTO TIMES,SHE SOLD OR LEASED SOME OF THE BALUCHISTAN ISLANDS TO OMAN FOR CASH.
SO  THIS SELLING OF TERRITORY IS NOT NEW TO PAKISTAN.
SO ALL THESE NOISE ABOUT CHINESE IN PAKISTANI OCCUPIED KASHMIR IS MEANINGLESS TO ANY IN INDIAN GOVERNMENT.
AS I SAID BEFORE IF INDIAN GOVERNMENT CLAIMS THE TERRITORY THAN THEY HAVE TO RECLAIM IT EITHER THROUGH WAR OR DIPLOMACY.
WITHOUT DOING BOTH OUR GOVERNMENT CAN ONLY BE A BYSTANDER IN THIS TROOP PRESENCE IN POK.
SO WHAT YOU GUYS THINK.

Thursday, September 30, 2010

INDO-CHINESE BORDER INCEDENTS

RECENTLY THERE HAS BEEN INCIDENTS LIKE THESE A LOT IN THE NEWS.BUT DO THEY MEAN A LOT TO THOSE PEOPLE INVOLVED IN THESE INCIDENTS THAT IS TO THE BORDER GUARDS BOTH SIDES,I DON'T KNOW. BUT SIDES CLAIM TO THE TIBET IS HISTORY WHILE INDIAN CLAIM TO TIBET IS RELIGIOUS AND CHINESE CLAIM IS IMPERIAL.
TO EXPLAIN IN DETAIL - HAVE YOU HEARD OF MOUNT KAILASH AND LAKE MANASAROVAR IN TIBET,IF YOU DIDN'T THEN GO AND LOOK FOR IT IN  THE INDIAN HISTORY.INDIAN WERE GOING TO THE MOUNT KAILASH FOR THE PAST 3000 YEARS AS PILGRIMS.THEY DIDN'T START GOING THERE FROM 1950'S.
BUT AS FAR AS CHINESE CLAIMS GO IT STATED FORM THERE CONQUEST IN 15TH CENTURY.
SO MY POINT IS INDIAN CLAIM IS OLDER TO CHINESE.
BUT AS FAR AS MODERN INDIAN GOVERNMENT CLAIMS GO THEY DECIDED TO RESTRICT THERE CLAIMS TO BRITISH COLONIAL BORDER OF MCMOHAN LINE.WHICH CHINESE REFUSED TO ACCEPT.SAYING TIBET WAS NEVER A INDEPENDENT STATE AND THUS DOES NOT HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO ENTER INTO  AGREEMENTS.
BUT AS FAR AS HISTORY GOES TIBET WAS INDEPENDENT FROM 1911 TO 1949 WHERE IT ENTERED INTO FOREIGN AGREEMENTS ON ITS OWN TERMS.EVEN IT TIBET WAS INDEPENDENT FOR ONE DAY THEN THEY HAVE EVERY RIGHT STAKE CLAIM TO A INDEPENDENT STATE AS THE IDEA OF A INDEPENDENT STATE IS ESTABLISHED IN THE MINDS OF TIBETANS.
SO WHERE DO THE MATTERS GO NOW. I THINK THE ISSUE WILL NOT BE SOLVED IN THE NEAR FUTURE. BECAUSE BOTH INDIA AND CHINA ARE NUCLEAR POWER NORLL ACCEPT OTHER CLAIMS NOR GIVE UP THEIRS.

SO WHAT DO YOU THINK.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

SINO JAPANESE TRAWLER ISSUE

CURRENTLY THE ISSUE IS RESOLVED WITH THE RELEASE OF THE CAPTIAN OF THE VESSEL.BUT I BELEIVE THE ISSUE IS FAR FROM OVER.I BELIVE THE ISSUE TO CONTINUE AS LONG AS CHINESE STAKE CLAIM TO THE ISLANDS.
ISSUE IS CHINESE CLAIM IS BASED ON THE FACT THEY RULED THE ISLANDS BEFORE THE JAPANESE CONQUEST  IN 1895 AND SUBQUENTLY BY THE DEFEAT OF JAPANESE IN SECOND WORLD WAR THE ISLANDS MUST BE RETURNED TO THEM.
BUT THE JAPANESE CLAIM IS THE ISLANDS WERE NEVER PART OF CHINA AND WILL NOT BE RETURNED BECAUSE THEY ANNEXED IT BEFORE THE 1895 TREATY.
SO MY OBSERVERATION IS BOTH ARE CORRECT IN THEIR POINT OF VEIWS.SO MY QUESTION TO THE CHINESE IS HOW DID THE ISLANDS BECAME PART OF CHINA - THE ANSWER IS - "BY CONQUEST IN 16th CENTURY".
SO WHEN THE CHINESE CAN CONQUER AND CLAIM IT TO THEM
JAPANESE CAN DO THE SAME.EVEN IF ACCEPT THE JAPANESE POSITION THAT THEY WERE NEVER PART OF CHINA IT WAS PART OF JAPAN FROM 1895 AND WOULD OF REMAINED WITH THEM IF NOT BY THE DEFEAT OF WORLD WAR.
THE NEW VICTOR USA CHOOSE TO GIVE IT TO THE JAPANESE IN THE 1970'S SO THAT ENDS THE CHINESE CLAIMS ON THE ISLAND.

SO NOW THE WHAT WILL HAPPEN NEXT. I BELIVE THAT THE ISLANDS WILL REMAIN WITH THE JAPANESE AS LONG AS THEY CHOOSE TO CLAIM IT AND DEFEND IT.AND CHOOSE NOT TOO EITHER THROUGH DILPMATIC OR MILITRY MEANS (THOUGH UNLIKLY FROM CHINESE SIDE) THE CHINESE TAKE IT BACK.

SO WHAT YOUR PEOPLE THINK OF THIS ANALYSIS. ANY COMMENTS